KJIPUKTUK (Halifax) – It is a well-known fact that disabled people face overwhelming rates of unemployment or under-employment. According to Statistics Canada’s most recent , conducted in 2012, only 47% of Canadians aged 15 to 64 with a disability said they were employed. Conversely, 74% of Canadians aged 15 to 64 without a disability were employed, according to the survey results.
With regards to a specific disability, there are 500,000 working-age autistic adults or adults with intellectual disabilities, but only one in four are employed.
So with that in mind, having programs in place to help autistic and other disabled people find employment sounds like a good idea.
But there’s a darker side to this that nobody talks about.
First off, let me say that I’m the first to agree that everyone deserves meaningful employment. As an autistic adult (and a millennial), I know how difficult it is to find work that’s in line with my level of education and my chosen career. So I do support these employment support programs in principle. And I certainly support inclusive hiring practices!
But I also have concerns.
- 75% or more of employers rate workers with intellectual disabilities as good to very good on performance factors
- 86% of employees with a disability rated average or better on attendance than their colleagues without a disability
- 98% of employees with a disability rate average or better in work safety than their colleagues without a disability
- 75% of employers surveyed said employing individuals with an intellectual disability or ASD has been a truly positive experience
As previously mentioned, disabled people face high rates of unemployment and under-employment, which therefore means they are overwhelmingly in the low-income or no-income categories. This means they can’t risk losing their jobs. They have a lot more to lose than non-disabled people if they call in sick or don’t perform according to the employer’s expectations.
So when companies boast about hiring disabled people to build an inclusive workforce, or comment that disabled people are so loyal to the company (or because they don’t complain), they may be in fact exploiting vulnerable people who have a lot to lose.
Disabled people don’t just want menial jobs
Another issue is that disabled people are frequently hired into menial, low-level positions. At the very least, these jobs are the ones employment support programs frequently inform their clients about.
Let me tell you about my experience with this.
A few years ago, when I was between film and television work, I signed up for Autism Nova Scotia’s Autism Job Seekers Database, which is done in partnership with Ready, Willing and Able (RWA).
I had a meeting with one of their coordinators, but it was soon obvious that this may not be the best option for someone of my experience and education levels.
Since I’m in the database, I frequently receive job opportunities that RWA helps recruit for. However, they are always meant for people who have no job experience at all. They include cleaning and maintenance jobs, warehouse technicians, gardeners and labourers, retail greeters, and other such positions.
Of course, hiring people – anybody – for these jobs isn’t a bad thing in and of itself, but as I’ve said, they’re clearly meant for people with no job experience at all. But people who have more experience and education may not be the best fit for these programs. Speaking for myself, I have two NSCC diplomas, several years of experience working for the federal government, and experience working in the film and television industry. And I have never worked in retail, or the food service industry, or any of the other jobs listed above.
I can assure you that if I were to apply, my application would likely be filtered out so that the employer doesn’t see it, because I would be considered overqualified and without the experience they’re looking for. (And many non-disabled people would have this challenge, as well.)
All too often, employment support programs are not person-centred, but rather make broad generalizations and assumptions about what autistic and other disabled people are interested in, and what their natural skills and abilities are.
For instance, an international company called helps autistic people find work, but they are primarily focused on technology-related work. Microsoft also has a . These can be useful, but . And the idea that autistic people are heavily into STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) is misleading and harmful.
Another common myth is that autistic people are good at jobs that are very repetitive and that other people find boring, because we pay so much attention to detail. This is also misleading, as just like other people would.
The fact is, disabled people can and do have the same kinds of jobs other people have. Some are professional writers, artists, musicians. Some are teachers, therapists, social activists. And yes, there are some who are good in STEM, as well.
Sheltered workshops, a contentious issue
One major point of contention for many disabled people is the issue of sheltered workshops. These are supposedly non-profit agencies that employ people with disabilities separate from non-disabled people. All too often, however, they pay less than minimum wage, sometimes less than one dollar an hour. There are currently in Nova Scotia known as “Adult Services Centres”, all supported by the Department of Community Services.
Currently, there is a major political to-do over sheltered workshops in Ontario. The recently-passed , the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, aims to phase out Ontario’s sheltered workshops by the end of the year. However, several non-disabled parents of disabled people , claiming that any job at all, even one that pays very little, .
I will be writing more about the issue of sheltered workshops in a future article.
Don’t force disabled people into boxes
If you can, please support the Nova Scotia Advocate so that it can continue to cover issues such as poverty, racism, exclusion, workers’ rights and the environment in Nova Scotia. A paywall is not an option, since it would exclude many readers who don’t have any disposable income at all. We rely entirely on one-time donations and a tiny but mighty group of dedicated monthly sustainers.