featured Poverty

Community Services: We cannot fix this unfairness for bureaucratic reasons

KJIPUKTUK (Halifax) – Barry Walters lives in Eastwood Manor, a downtown Dartmouth apartment building managed by the Metropolitan Regional Housing Authority (MRHA).   

Although small and dark, Walters likes it here. Their apartment is on the first floor, and since Walters’ wife is disabled that makes both feel safer.

What he doesn’t like is that the rent went up in his public housing unit, from $285 when he first move in in late 2015, to a whopping $812 per month today.  

Rents for public housing units are calculated based on income. Because Walters turned 65 recently and qualified for an Old Age Security pension he now does make a bit more than before.

But the killer is the caregiver benefit Walters receives to allow him to look after his wife. The program is intended for caregivers of low income adults who have a high level of disability or impairment. Walters receives $400 per month, and the Housing Authority says that’s income..   

The thing is, when you are on social assistance that very same caregiver benefit does not count as income.

Yet both social assistance and public housing are the responsibility of Joanne Bernard, the minister of Community Services. So why can’t Housing Nova Scotia and Community Services get their story straight?

Our hands are tied, writes Community Services spokesperson Heather Fairbairn in an emailed response to our questions.

“Housing Nova Scotia operates under a joint agreement between the federal and provincial governments. Under the agreement, all income is treated as eligible income unless specifically excluded,” writes Fairbairn.

In response to a follow up question Fairbairn sent us the federal Canada Mortgage and Housing Commission (CMHC) Definitions Handbook, where what is considered income is further defined. She was unable to point me to the federal-provincial agreement in question.

Our question whether the province had made any effort at all to have the caregiver benefit exempted from the income definition remained unanswered.

The manual is years old and wouldn’t be expected to make reference to a new allowance. That said, there are certain incomes that are exempt, typically those not intended to contribute toward shelter costs.

It is not clear why the province is so accepting of a federal rule that creates financial hardship for people like Walters and does not align with the department’s own income definition.

It certainly doesn’t help Walters one bit.

“I don’t think it is right, says Walters. “The apartment, as far as I am concerned, is bottom of the line. It simply isn’t worth the kind of rent we now pay.”

If you can, please support the Nova Scotia Advocate so that it can continue to cover issues such as poverty, racism, exclusion, workers’ rights and the environment in Nova Scotia. A pay wall is not an option, since it would exclude many readers who don’t have any disposable income at all. We rely entirely on one-time donations and a tiny but mighty group of dedicated monthly sustainers.




  1. Community services has no issues keeping abusive foster parents. Proven cases, proven receipt of the complaints by the Minister. No problem hiding these cases and keeping the foster parents on and keep paying them $5-600 per month per child. Do you know how many foster parents take that money and go to Cuba each year, without the foster kids that paid for it. It is quite disgusting. So, I simply do not understand WHY community services cannot simply turn a blind eye to this one case. Oh, they are allowed to take the kids out of NS.

  2. The title of this article is misleading. I think you allowed the people you talked to (referenced in this article) to push the blame on someone else. And you’re willing to spread this rhetoric?

Comments are closed.