Wednesday, 12 December 2018
featured Poverty

Kendall Worth: More special diet blues

KJIPUKTUK (Halifax) – Over the past few weeks I have had conversations with five income assistance recipients who lost their special diets, even though their medical doctors told Community Services that the diet was medically necessary.  

What these people experienced has a lot in common with what happened to me in 2013.

Anyway, here is what each of these people, who asked not to be identified, have lost following their last annual review and the removal of their special diet allowance:

Person 1Lost $54, four months ago.
Person 2Lost $30, five months ago.
Person 3Lost $27, four months ago.
Person 4Lost $54, six months ago
Person 5Also lost $54.

As you can see these people lost a lot of money toward their healthy eating budget.

They mentioned that they had already gone through the appeals process and got denied after the appeal hearing.

A caseworker uses Section 6.3.3 of the ESIA policy manual to make decisions regarding special diets.

The problem with that policy is that the doctor’s medical reasons for a special diet do not always match up with the medical conditions mentioned in that policy.

The other big problem is that doctors get annoyed when their diagnoses are questioned by caseworkers, who have no medical training whatsoever.

Sometimes doctors end up refusing to deal with the matter any more.

It has been said that in those cases you could complain to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.  I believe that’s the wrong response.

Complaining is only going to annoy these doctors even more. It may even cause these doctors to dismiss these patients from their practice!

Complaining to the College of Physicians and Surgeons will do nothing to hold Community Services accountable. It is also safe to say this action will not get the lost special diet allowance reinstated.  

See also: Kendall Worth –Community Services case worker knows better than doctor about special diet requirements 

 


If you can, please support the Nova Scotia Advocate so that it can continue to cover issues such as poverty, racism, exclusion, workers’ rights and the environment in Nova Scotia. A paywall is not an option, since it would exclude many readers who don’t have any disposable income at all. We rely entirely on one-time donations and a tiny but mighty group of dedicated monthly sustainers.

Subscribe to the Nova Scotia Advocate weekly digest and never miss an article again.

 

 

One Comment

Post Comment