featured Healthcare Inclusion

Alex Kronstein: More fruit of the poisonous tree – “Treating” Autism and the so-called kinder, gentler ABA

KJIPUKTUK (Halifax) – In my previous article, I discussed the links between Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) and gay conversion therapy.

Today I want to discuss the so-called “modern” ABA, and how it is also concerning to many people and organizations.

EIBI in Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia’s Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention program is available to all preschool children diagnosed with autism.  Some families choose to defer school entry for their children, because once they are in school they’re no longer eligible for EIBI.

EIBI in Nova Scotia primarily uses Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), a “naturalistic” form of ABA pioneered by psychologists Drs. Robert and Lynn Koegel.  As described by the Department of Health and Wellness,

“PRT is a scientifically validated treatment that focuses on teaching children skills using both motivational strategies and the principles of applied behaviour analysis (ABA).  The main goals of treatment are to facilitate development of the children’s communication, play and other functional skills. These skills are taught through the systematic use of learning (motivational and ABA) principles, beginning at a developmental level appropriate for each individual child.  Treatment focuses on ‘pivotal’ or fundamental areas (e.g., motivation) that result in widespread gains in skill development.”

Well, that may sound good on the face of it, but I suggest you read some comments by the founders of PRT, the Koegels.

Lynn Koegel co-wrote a book called “Overcoming Autism: Finding the Answers, Strategies, and Hope that Can Transform a Child’s Life”.  The book was first published in 2005, and a second edition in 2014. Some chapter titles include:

Diagnosis: Surviving the Worst News You’ll Ever Get

Battling Fears and Fixations: Bringing Your Child Back to the Real World

Family Life: Fighting Your Way Back to Normalcy

I was told that the book is frequently requested by parents whose kids are in the EIBI program.

For the record, some have said that they loathe the title, but still.

What do the Koegels really think?

If you want to know what the Koegels really think, take a look at this interview with them from around 2006, when the book often cited in Nova Scotia’s EIBI literature was published.  Here are some of the most egregious quotes, along with my comments.

“Children often hate having to perform drill practices involved with other autism treatments, they feel like they are being forced to do something they don’t enjoy and they react to this by causing a scene to get out of treatment.  The child will throw tantrums and resist therapy. In contrast, children enjoy PRT and look forward to therapy, no tantrums. Parents love PRT because their children do, they have less to worry about, and this leads to a decrease in their stress level.”

This is a major area of concern for many autistic people.  PRT claims to be child-led, and that kids look forward to therapy sessions.  But the idea that the child has a choice is inaccurate.  PRT is still fundamentally compliance-based, and it should be asked if the child really knows they have a choice if they comply with the therapist’s requests.  And even if they did have a choice, it’s entirely possible that they’ll still do what they think the adult wants them to do.

Also, on this idea that the kids have fun in PRT sessions (or any kind of ABA)….it IS possible to have fun while being coerced.  People, especially kids, can be reinforced to look happy, but it doesn’t mean they really are happy.

“The speed of recovery with PRT is much faster than with other forms of therapy.”

“Recovery” from autism.  A perfect example of their thinking.

“After discovering PRT and two years of this therapy at the Koegel Autism Center, Lauri was told by her son’s developmental pediatrician that he could no longer diagnose him, now age 4½, as autistic.  Today, his teachers have no idea that he was ever diagnosed with autism.”

So the doctor considers the boy “cured”?  Is that what we’re supposed to read into this?

“‘Peter’ (name changed to protect privacy) was receiving treatment during his every waking hour.  He has gone from being a completely non-verbal, distant, difficult, and tantrumming child, with troubling stims and perseverations to a chatty, agreeable, empathetic and gregarious, well-behaved young boy.”

Autistic children do not need “treatment” 24/7!  Once again, there’s more than one way to communicate…..don’t place so much emphasis on oral speech!  And why is it so important to be “gregarious”…..lots of people are introverts, autistic or not.

And I’m not at all surprised that PRT aims to quash stimming….that’s a key element of all forms of ABA.  But stimming is so important for lots of autistics….watch this video from Amythest Schaber for an explanation. (Also, one of the chapters in Overcoming Autism is all about ways to stop stimming.)

And worst of all……

“It is considered a behavior intervention with similarities to the Lovaas method/ABA.”

That pretty much says it all, doesn’t it?

It should also be noted that Robert Koegel was Ivar Lovaas’ lead researcher at UCLA.

So this is what we have in Nova Scotia.  And no one ever questions it.

Fruit of the poisonous tree…..and the new resistance in Canada

So as you can see, ABA by any other name is still ABA. There really is no such thing as “modern ABA”.  They may not be so blatant about “building the person” today, but the idea that autistic ways of being are wrong is nonetheless still the foundation that ALL forms of ABA are built upon. No matter how “kinder and gentler” than the Lovaas method it may be, it is still fruit of the poisonous tree.

And it’s not just publicly funded in Nova Scotia….ABA and IBI is publicly funded to a certain extent in every province and territory in Canada.  Furthermore, some highly ableist and irresponsible people would like to see ABA funded at the federal level.

But autistic Canadians are fighting back.

One of the most prominent groups is A4A Ontario.  Formed in early 2017, their main goal is to see the Ontario Autism Plan restructured so as to have meaningful consultation with autistic people and others who have been left out of the process.  In particular, they want to see ABA/IBI phased out completely, and replaced with more respectful supports for autistic children.

Another organization with similar goals is Canadian Autistics United.  CAU is an independent Canadian-run organization run by and for autistic people, having begun when the Vancouver and Winnipeg chapters of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network were rebranded.  They are interested in expanding their organization with more chapters across the country.

(Full disclosure: I am a supporter of both organizations.)

In my next article, I’ll talk about some ideas to use instead of ABA or EIBI.  But I’ll close out this one with some words from noted autistic activist Lei Wiley-Mydske.

So many people tell me their kids “love” ABA, but then do not understand why their child’s anxiety and “aggressive behaviours” get worse after they start ABA.

People refuse to see the connection because they are told that the aggression and anxiety are part of being Autistic, not part of how we react to what people do to us.

Lei Wiley-Mydske


If you can, please support the Nova Scotia Advocate so that it can continue to cover issues such as poverty, racism, exclusion, workers’ rights and the environment in Nova Scotia. A paywall is not an option, since it would exclude many readers who don’t have any disposable income at all. We rely entirely on one-time donations and a tiny but mighty group of dedicated monthly sustainers.

Subscribe to the Nova Scotia Advocate weekly digest and never miss an article again.

2 Comments

  1. I have some concerns about the bias in this article. (Too long; Didn’t read version of my comment – The only thing I was able to conclude from this article is that you didn’t like the Koegel’s book and you’re not a fan of PRT because the child isn’t necessarily given a choice not to participate. Neither of which have anything to do with modern ABA as a whole.)

    In your article against modern ABA, you didn’t actually present an argument against ABA. From the beginning, you chose one specific treatment – PRT, described it, and then proceeded to attack the wording in a book written by two Psychologists – not the treatment itself.
    In your next section, you speak against PRT based on the idea that the children do not get a choice to participate, which I would agree with, but the idea that the child can simply choose not to participate in the therapy, completely defeats the purpose of the intervention. Apply the scenario to something besides behavior modification and the contradiction becomes clearer. Imagine if children simply had the choice to leave school because they find it aversive. Or if a child chose not to wear clothing in the winter because they found the feeling aversive. The imagine if any alternative you found to solve those issues, the child also chose not to participate with. So, making the argument that the child should be taught to, and able to, “say no” and choose not to comply with the intervention, defeats the purpose of the intervention to begin with. And you also speak about the child being coerced in a negative connotation. Of course the child is being coerced. That’s the point – to reinforce positive behaviors while discouraging problematic behaviors. That’s literally the entire point of behavior modification. Oh, and I appreciate your plug to your own podcast in order to reinforce that point about coercion. And lastly on that section, you brought up concerns that people can be reinforced to look happy without actually being happy. What you’re talking about is non-observable – which is something ABA specifically does not deal with. Behavior Analysts aren’t mind readers. They can only operate off of the behavior you’re displaying. So, while that is a valid criticism in the fact that Analysts cannot see concealed inner emotions, it’s hardly a fair criticism since no one can do that – in any field or any discipline. The rest of that section is more criticisms of quotes from one book – none about the treatment.

    So at what point in this article did you actually talk about modern ABA? The only thing I was able to conclude from this article is that you didn’t like the Koegel’s book and you’re not a fan of PRT because the child isn’t necessarily given a choice not to participate. When are you going to discuss Behavior Analyst Certification Board’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts and how these guidelines have propelled the relatively new field leaps and bounds from when it started in the 70’s? We’re talking about a field of study that’s only about 40 years old. Compared to other fields of study, ABA is still a child itself. But it can’t improve without further research, and the cost of that research is why we have ethical guidelines to begin with, but we can only build from valid feedback – which is not what you have written here.

    Reply
  2. Have you heard about the Son-Rise Program? It encourages parents & care-givers to JOIN in stimming as a connecting tool … lots of great approaches from my perspective (which sees ABA as dog training)

    Reply

Post Comment